Results from the Seattle and Denver Income Maintenance Experiments are used to predict nationwide labor-supply effects and costs of six alternative negative income tax programs. To make the predictions, a labor-supply model parameterizing the experimental treatments is estimated using...

This study examines the effects of the Seattle and Denver Income Maintenance Experiments (SIME/DIME) on the work effort of persons whose age is over 16 and under 21 at enrollment in the experiment and who are children, stepchildren, and grandchildren of heads of their families at enrollment. The...

In this paper, a model of participation in the Seattle and Denver Income Maintenance Experiments (SIME/DIME) is developed and estimated. The model explains why a family chooses to receive negative income tax (NIT) payments, chooses to remain in the experiment but not receive payments, or chooses...

The significance of both human and financial capitalamong small start-up businesses is investigated.Using data from the U.S.Department of Labor:the Washington Self-Employment and EnterpriseDevelopment Demonstration (SEED), a better understanding of the role of bothfinancial and human capital...

Examines outreach, admissions, and center characteristics and practices that appear to promote positive experiences for Job Corps students. Finds that outreach and admissions counselors play a key role in these experiences, as do center characteristics and strength of the academic and vocational...

Summarizes the main findings from a series of other reports on the study. Concludes that centers deliver comprehensive and consistent services. Furthermore, Job Corps makes a meaningful difference in educational attainment and earnings; gains are found across most groups of students and types of...

Using nonexperimental methods, presents estimates of the effects of Job Corps for participants who complete vocational training and those who do not, as well as for participants who obtain a GED and those who do not. For hard copy contact Battelle Memorial Institute at (206) 525-3130.

Describes implementation of random assignment and sample intake, presents evidence that the process was implemented in a way that will enable the study to realize its goals, and draws lessons from the experience that may be applicable to other program evaluations.