Showing 71 - 80 of 216
Using a global M&A data set, this paper provides evidence that the empirical observations relating public acquisitions to, at best, zero abnormal returns, and their stock-financed subset to negative abnormal returns for acquiring firms around the deal announcement are not unanimous across...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013152431
We provide new evidence on the role of financial advisors in M&As. Contrary to prior studies, top-tier advisors deliver higher bidder returns than their non-top-tier counterparts but in public acquisitions only, where the advisor reputational exposure and required skills set are relatively...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013133839
We extend the U.S. bank M&As literature by examining bidder announcement abnormal returns in deals involving both public and private targets over a 32-years examination period. Our main findings document the existence of a listing effect in our sample. Banks gain when they acquire private firms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853355
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012239291
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012114534
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012155548
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012609253
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012656589
This study explores the impact of joint corporate asset restructuring decisions where firms sell an asset in order to fund a subsequent acquisition (selling-to-buy). We find that firms with asset sales are associated with increased acquisition probability. The effect is more pronounced for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012854948
M&A deals create more value for acquiring firm shareholders post-2009 than ever before. Public acquisitions fuel positive and statistically significant abnormal returns for acquirers while stock-for-stock deals no longer destroy value. Mega deals, priced at least $500 mil, typically associated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012935411