Showing 171 - 180 of 676,253
Using the model of Rochet and Vives (2004), this note shows that a prudential regulator can in general not mitigate a bank’s failure risk solely by means of liquidity requirements. However, their effectiveness can be restored if, in addition, minimum capital requirements are met. This provides...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003973628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008901979
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008906133
The paper provides a baseline model for regulatory analysis of systemic liquidity shocks. We show that banks may have an incentive to invest excessively in illiquid long term projects. In the prevailing mixed strategy equilibrium the allocation is inferior from the investor's point of view since...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003951791
This paper provides a compact framework for banking regulation analysis in the presence of uncertainty between systemic liquidity and solvency shocks. Extending the work by Cao & Illing (2009a, b), it is shown that systemic liquidity shortage arises endogenously as part of the inferior mixed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003952099
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003959154
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003994407
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008647540
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008702968
The recent crisis was characterized by massive illiquidity. This paper reviews what we know and don't know about illiquidity and all its friends: market freezes, fire sales, contagion, and ultimately insolvencies and bailouts. It first explains why liquidity cannot easily be apprehended through...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008732226