Showing 1 - 10 of 183
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003839918
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009247140
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011300787
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001750586
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011590868
We find that, due to arbitrage around index changes, investors in Samp;P 500-linked funds lose between 0.03% and 0.12% annually, while investors in Russell 2000-linked funds lose between 1.30% and 1.84%. In dollar terms, the losses range from $3.75 billion to $6 billion a year for the two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012736991
We study the price effects of firms added to and deleted from the Samp;P 500 index and document an asymmetric price response: there is a permanent increase in the price of added firms but no similar decline for deleted firms. These results are at odds with extant explanations of the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012739528
Because of arbitrage around the time of index changes, investors in funds linked to the Samp;P 500 Index and the Russell 2000 Index lose between $1.0 billion and $2.1 billion a year for the two indices combined. The losses can be higher if benchmarked assets are considered, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012779628
We find that, on average, firms added to the Samp;P 500 index experience a permanent price increase, while those deleted from it suffer only a temporary price decline. Existing theories, such as a downward sloping demand curve, liquidity, and information, fail to explain the asymmetric response....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012784991
We study the price effects of firms added to and deleted from the Samp;P 500 index and document an asymmetric price response: there is a permanent increase in the price of added firms but no similar decline for deleted firms. These results are at odds with extant explanations of the effects of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012786406