Showing 1 - 10 of 62
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003244194
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011939646
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003490995
Recently proposed models of risky choice imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Five studies explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by four descriptive models. To distinguish trueʺ violations from those produced by error,ʺ a model was fit in which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003374889
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008904463
This paper presents an experimental test of several independence conditions implied by expected utility and alternative models. We perform a repeated choice experiment and fit an error model that allows us to discriminate between true violations of independence and those that can be attributed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950296
This paper tests Birnbaum’s (2004) theory that the constant consequence paradoxes of Allais are due to violations of coalescing, the assumption that when two branches lead to the same consequence, they can be combined by adding their probabilities. Rank dependent utility and cumulative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003950768
Several models of choice under uncertainty imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. Our experiments explored whether people show patterns of intransitivity predicted by these models. To distinguish "true" violations from those produced by "error," a model was fit in which each...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003617822
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011349546
The present paper reports a repeated experiment on decision making under risk where subjects have to tackle the same choice problems in several rounds. We fit a simple error model and investigate how behavior changes in the course of the experiment. Our analysis complements and extends Hey...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010486756