Showing 1 - 10 of 443
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001737255
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002233841
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001724563
We examine over 7400 analyst recommendations made in the year after going public for IPOs from 1999 to 2000. Initiations of coverage at the end of the quiet period come almost exclusively from affiliated analysts, whereas initiations afterward are predominantly from unaffiliated analysts....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004999378
We examine the expiration of the IPO quiet period, which occurs after the 25-super-th calendar day following the offering. For IPOs during 1996 to 2000, we find that analyst coverage is initiated immediately for 76 percent of these firms, almost always with a favorable rating. Initiated firms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005302630
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007917715
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010113676
We examine over 7,400 analyst recommendations in the year after going public for IPOs from 1999-2000. Initiations at the end of the quiet period come almost exclusively from affiliated analysts, while initiations afterwards are predominantly from unaffiliated analysts. Once we control for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012706252
We examine over 7400 analyst recommendations made in the year after going public for IPOs from 1999 to 2000. Initiations of coverage at the end of the quiet period come almost exclusively from affiliated analysts, whereas initiations afterward are predominantly from unaffiliated analysts....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012716193
Newly public companies are subject to a quot;quiet periodquot; restricting insiders and affiliated underwriters from issuing earnings forecasts and research reports regarding the firm for a specified period following the initial public offering (IPO). As soon as this quiet period ends, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012785561