Narrow search
Showing 1 - 10 of 482
Cover Image
Preference learning versus coherent arbitrariness : NOAA guidelines or a learning design contingent valuation (LDCV)
Bateman, Ian; Burgess, Diane; Hutchinson, W. G.; … - 2006
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003385983
Cover Image
Testing the stability of the benefit transfer function for discrete choice contingent valuation data
Matthews, David I. (contributor);  … - 2007
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003476233
Cover Image
Testing preference formation in learning design contingent valuation (LDCV) using advanced information and repetitive treatments
Aravena, Claudia; Hutchinson, W. G.; Carlsson, Frederik; … - 2015
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010506231
Cover Image
Testing preference formation in learning design contingent valuation using advance information and repetitive treatments
Aravena, Claudia; Hutchinson, W. G.; Carlsson, Frederik; … - In: Land economics : applied research on environmental resources 94 (2018) 2, pp. 284-301
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011856814
Cover Image
Learning Effects In Repeated Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions
Hutchinson, George; Bateman, Ian; Burgess, Diane; … - Royal Economic Society - RES - 2004
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005577058
Cover Image
Preference learning versus coherent arbitrariness: NOAA guidelines or a learning design contingent valuation (LDCV)
Bateman, Ian J.; Burgess, Diane; Hutchinson, W. George; … - 2006
We extend the contingent valuation (CV) method to test three differing conceptions of individuals' preferences as either: (i) a-priori well-formed or readily divined and revealed through a single dichotomous choice question (as per the NOAA CV guidelines; Arrow et al., 1993]; (ii) learned or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010319062
Cover Image
Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
Bateman, Ian J.; Burgess, Diane; Hutchinson, W. George; … - In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2008) 2, pp. 127-141
We extend the contingent valuation (CV) method to test three differing conceptions of individuals' preferences as either (i) a-priori well-formed or readily divined and revealed through a single dichotomous choice question (as per the NOAA CV guidelines [K. Arrow, R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005239560
Cover Image
Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
Bateman, Ian J.; Burgess, Diane; Hutchinson, W. George; … - In: Journal of environmental economics and management : … 55 (2008) 2, pp. 127-142
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008850584
Cover Image
Consequentiality and demand revelation in double referenda
Carson, Katherine Silz; Chilton, Susan M.; Hutchinson, W. G. - In: Environmental economics, experimental methods, (pp. 407-423). 2008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003647684
Cover Image
Necessary conditions for demand revelation in double referenda
Carson, Katherine Silz; Chilton, Susan M.; Hutchinson, W. G. - In: Journal of environmental economics and management : … 57 (2009) 2, pp. 219-225
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003832603