Showing 111 - 120 of 236
This paper questions the impact of Bhimani's (1999), Harrison's & McKinnon's (1999), McSweeney's (2002a) and Baskerville's (2003) critiques of Hofstede's model on accounting research. We assess how cultural studies published in accounting journals and referring to these critiques have been...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010551147
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010723179
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008160238
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010158138
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007235012
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007969683
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008890634
Cette communication évalue l'impact des critiques du modèle de Hofstede par Bhimani (1999), Harrison & McKinnon (1999), McSweeney (2002a) et Baskerville (2003) sur la recherche comptable. Nous évaluons comment les études culturelles publiées dans les revues en CCA se référant à ces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010635124
Since Hofstede published his book, The consequences of culture, numerous comparative studies have flourished and built on the well-known five-dimension model. In 1999, two critiques were addressed to these pieces of work. Bhimani (1999) critiqued their homogeneity and poor ability to enhance our...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010635243
Our paper addresses what the moral foundations of accounting are, regardless of capitalistic operations, as we are seeking to trace a genealogy of accounting thinking disconnected from coincidence with Capitalism. We demonstrate that the three monotheisms have bared the core of accounting. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010635269