Showing 131 - 140 of 22,104
We propose a two-stage process called minority voting to allocate public projects in a polity. In the first period, a society decides by a simple majority decision whether to provide the public project. If the proposal in the first period is rejected, the process ends. Otherwise the process...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003627811
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003630747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011386806
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002531247
The author proposes a two-round process called minority voting to allocate public projects in a polity. In the first round, a society decides by a simple majority decision whether to provide the public project. If the proposal in the first round is rejected, the process ends. Otherwise the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013132098
We propose a two-stage process called minority voting to allocate public projects in a polity. In the first period, a society decides by a simple majority decision whether to provide the public project. If the proposal in the first period is rejected, the process ends. Otherwise the process...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013132433
Many industries use dynamic pricing on an operational level to maximize revenue from selling a fixed capacity over a finite horizon. Classical risk-neutral approaches do not accommodate the risk aversion often encountered in practice. When risk aversion is considered, time-consistency becomes an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892326
We propose that a simple 'dual-self' model gives a unified explanation for several empirical regularities, including the apparent time-inconsistency that has motivated models of hyperbolic discounting and Rabin's paradox of risk aversion in the large and small. The model also implies that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012709841
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012513245
In this paper we propose minority voting as a scheme that can partially protect individuals from the risk of repeated exploitation. We consider a committee that meets twice to decide about projects where the first-period project may have a long-lasting impact. In the first period a simple open...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013316931