Showing 11 - 20 of 420
Gneezy, List and Wu [Q. J. Econ. 121 (2006) 1283-1309] document that lotteries are often valued less than the lotteries’ worst outcomes. We show how to undo this result.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005090599
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so-called uncertainty effect, namely, that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. While the authors implemented a verbal lottery...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157185
Gneezy, List and Wu [Q. J. Econ. 121 (2006) 1283-1309] document that lotteries are often valued less than the lotteries’ worst outcomes. We show how to undo this result.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005086624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014202652
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so-called uncertainty effect, namely, that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery’s worse outcome. While the authors implemented a verbal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008528422
We replicate three pricing tasks of Gneezy, List and Wu (2006) for which they document the so called uncertainty effect, namely that people value a binary lottery over non-monetary outcomes less than other people value the lottery's worse outcome. Unlike the authors who implement a verbal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005090512
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003907005
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003593191
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003724886
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003161690