copayment for ambulatory care in 2004 for individuals with statutory health insurance (SHI). Because persons with private …-in-difference approach to examine whether the new copayment effectively reduced the overall demand for physician visits and to explore … same time, we did not observe a deterrent effect among vulnerable individuals. Thus, the copayment has failed to reduce the …

copayment for ambulatory care in 2004 for individuals with statutory health insurance (SHI). Because persons with private …-in-difference approach to examine whether the new copayment effectively reduced the overall demand for physician visits and to explore … same time, we did not observe a deterrent effect among vulnerable individuals. Thus, the copayment has failed to reduce the …

copayment for ambulatory care in 2004 for individuals with statutory health insurance (SHI). Because persons with private …-in-difference approach to examine whether the new copayment effectively reduced the overall demand for physician visits and to explore … same time, we did not observe a deterrent effect among vulnerable individuals. Thus, the copayment has failed to reduce the …

copayment for ambulatory care in 2004 for individuals with statutory health insurance (SHI). Because persons with private …-in-difference approach to examine whether the new copayment effectively reduced the overall demand for physician visits and to explore … same time, we did not observe a deterrent effect among vulnerable individuals. Thus, the copayment has failed to reduce the …

physicians' services. As a part of the reform, co-payments for prescription drugs were increased step up to 200%. However … for physicians' services of the treated, those subject to increased co-payments, can be assessed. The differences …-in-differences estimates indicate that increased co-payments reduced the number of doctor visits by about 10% on an average. -- co-payment …