Showing 51 - 60 of 79
Although empirical studies show that common shareholding affects corporate conduct and that common horizontal shareholding lessens competition, critics have argued that the law should not take any action until we have clearer proof on the causal mechanisms. I show that we actually have ample...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849569
Some recent literature has concluded that patent remedies result in systematically excessive royalties because of holdup and stacking problems. This article shows that this literature is mistaken. The royalty rates predicted by the holdup models are often (plausibly most of the time) below the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012750094
Introduction -- Which horizontal agreements are illegal? -- What unilateral conduct is illegal? -- Vertical agreements that restrict dealing with rivals -- Distorting downstream distribution of a supplier's products -- Proving an agreement or concerted action -- Mergers and acquisitions --...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011854758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011763733
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007900433
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008310429
Various arguments attempting to resurrect the single monopoly profit theory of tying have been made, but none are successful. The Seabright claim that it is supported by a lack of empirical proof fails because the single monopoly profit theory is an impossibility theory, and my recommended...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014198073
Proper analysis of the Google books settlement requires framing the issues correctly in two important respects. First, it requires understanding that sound antitrust analysis turns on likely effects on consumer welfare, not on debatable spins of arid formalisms. Second, it requires measuring...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014198108
We consider loyalty discounts whereby the seller promises to give buyers who commit to buy from it a lower price than the seller gives to uncommitted buyers. We show that an incumbent seller can use loyalty discounts to soften price competition between itself and a rival, which raises market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014198559
Loyalty discounts are agreements to sell at a lower price to buyers who buy all or most of their purchases from the seller. This article proves that (assuming no efficiency justifications) loyalty discounts can create anticompetitive effects, not only because they can impair rival efficiency,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014214309