Showing 51 - 60 of 1,892
To commit credibly in bargaining is crucial: In the ultimatum game with its one–sided early commitment power the “proposer” gets (nearly) the whole pie while the“responder” is left with (almost) nothing. When both parties commit simultaneouslythe (a)symmetric Nash(1950)–bargaining...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866908
We examine the strategic behavior of first and second movers in a two party bargaining game with uncertain information transmission. When the first mover states her demand she does only know the probability with which the second mover will be informed about it. If the second mover is informed,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866971
We study first- and second-price private value auctions with sequential bidding where second movers may discover the first movers bids. There is a unique equilibrium in the first-price auction and multiple equilibria in the second-price auction. Consequently, comparative statics across price...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010433909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001752888
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001773809
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001818047
In three party ultimatum games the proposer can first decide whether to exclude one responder, what increases the available pie. The experiments control for intentionality of exclusion and veto power of the third party. We do not find evidence for indirect reciprocity of the remaining responder...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009374355
We experimentally test the effect of enforceable non-compete clauses on working efforts. The employee can invest into the probability of making a profitable innovation. After a successful innovation (Win) the employee may want to leave the firm (Shift) whereas after an innovation failure (Lose)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010189318
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009687451
We experimentally test the effect of enforceable non-compete clauses on working efforts. The employee can invest into the probability of making a profitable innovation. After a successful innovation (Win) the employee may want to leave the firm (Shift) whereas after an innovation failure (Lose)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010194567