Showing 1 - 10 of 58,425
agent feels bad when not reaching a target effort set in the contract. While the presence of guilt brings the outcome closer … target, inducing guilt which must be compensated by a higher financial reward. Thus, although the principal's payoff is …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012110631
We consider guilt averse agents and principals and study the effects of guilt on optimal behavior of the principal and … guilt when failing to provide the target effort, the principal when paying less than the contract requires or when setting … an unreasonably high target effort. In equilibrium, a guilt-prone agent chooses a higher effort than an agent who only …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263824
We consider guilt averse agents and principals and study the effects of guilt on optimal behavior of the principal and … suffers from guilt when failing to provide the target effort, the principal when paying less than the contract requires or … when setting an unreasonably high target effort. In equilibrium, a guilt-prone agent chooses a higher effort than an agent …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005090532
We consider guilt averse agents and principals and study the effects ofguilt on optimal behavior of the principal and … guilt when failing to provide the target effort,the principal when paying less than the contract requires or when settingan … unreasonably high target effort.In equilibrium, a guilt-prone agent chooses a higher effort than anagent who only cares about …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866609
That individuals contribute in social dilemma interactions even when contributing is costly is a well-established observation in the experimental literature. Since a contributor is always strictly worse off than a non-contributor the question is raised if an intrinsic motivation to contribute...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261072
That individuals contribute in social dilemma interactions even when contributing is costly is a well-established observation in the experimental literature. Since a contributor is always strictly worse off than a non-contributor the question is raised if an intrinsic motivation to contribute...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005015539
In line with the widely applied principle of just deserts, we assume that the severity of the penalty on a contract offender increases in the harm on the other. When this principle holds, the influence of the efficiency of the agreement on the incentives to abide by it crucially depends on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010266677
In line with the widely applied principle of just deserts, we assume that the severity of the penalty on a contract offender increases in the harm on the other. When this principle holds, the influence of the efficiency of the agreement on the incentives to abide by it crucially depends on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010281267
Experiments suggest that communication increases the contribution to public goods (Ledyard, 1995). There is also evidence that, when contemplating a lie, people trade off their private benefit from the lie with the harm it inflicts on others (Gneezy, 2005). We develop a model of bilateral...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005252194
In line with the widely applied principle of just deserts, we assume that the severity of the penalty on a contract offender increases in the harm on the other. When this principle holds, the influence of the efficiency of the agreement on the incentives to abide by it crucially depends on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005090601