Showing 1 - 10 of 3,658
This paper proposes an analytical framework to examine the market and welfare impacts of GMOs, when some consumers refuse genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and when two supply channels are segregated (one for goods that containing GMOs and one for non-genetically-modified identity-preserved...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009443819
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003861032
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009524447
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009524448
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001667445
Our aim is to explore who pays the costs and who reaps the benefits of maintaining a dual-market system of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and non-GMOs. We analyze the welfare effects of the introduction of consumer “hatred” given GMO technology and the introduction of GMO technology...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010544591
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013493104
Our aim is to explore who pays the costs and who reaps the benefits of maintaining a dual-market system of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and non-GMOs. We analyze the welfare effects of the introduction of consumer “hatred” given GMO technology and the introduction of GMO technology...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014207326
The paper analyzes the welfare effects of the introduction of GMO technology into a market in which a fraction of consumers refuses to buy GMOs. Our theoretical model recognizes that segregation and identity preservation (IP) of non-GMOs may create costs for both IP producers and non-IP...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005805978
In their recent article in this journal, Demont et al. (2009) discuss the effects of alternative spatial ex ante coexistence regulations (SEACERs) in the context of the EU regulatory framework. We retain from Demont et al. (2009) that small pollen barriers should be considered as a possible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008507152