Showing 1 - 10 of 13,244
intermediate agreements serve as disagreement points in subsequent rounds. We identify robustness criteria which are satisfied by … Discrete Raiffa solutions. We show that the .robustness of intermediate agreements. plus additional well-known and plausible …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010593103
intermediate agreements serve as disagreement points in subsequent rounds. We identify robustness criteria which are satisfied by … Discrete Raiffa solutions. We show that the “robustness of intermediate agreements” plus additional well-known and plausible …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011049666
Suppes-Sen Dominance is a commonly accepted criterion of impartiality in distributive justice. Mariotti (1999) characterized the Nash bargaining solution using Nash (1950).s Scale Invariance (SI) axiom and an axiom named Suppes-Sen Proofness (SSP) that embodies the Suppes-Sen principle. By...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008474120
I characterize the proportional N-person bargaining solutions by individual rationality, translation invariance, feasible set continuity, and a new axiom - interim improvement. The latter says that if the disagreement point d is known, but the feasible set is not - it may be either S or T, where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009324196
Although many real bargaining situations involve more than two people, much of the theoretical and experimental research concentrates on the two player situation. We study the simplest possible extension: four people (two two-person groups) of different patience bargain with each other....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010291816
We analyze the performance of various communication protocols in a generalization of the Crawford-Sobel (1982) model of cheap talk that allows for multiple receivers. We find that whenever the sender can communicate informatively with both receivers by sending private messages, she can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010291984
In the context of international bargaining, standard models predict that a shift in military power can cause preventive war because it changes the relative bargaining position between states. We find that shifts in military power are not the only cause of war under commitment problems and that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010292375
Although many real bargaining situations involve more than two people, much of the theoretical and experimental research concentrates on the two player situation. We study the simplest possible extension: four people (two two-person groups) of different patience bargain with each other....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010292499
Human development is about expanding the choices human beings have to lead lives that they value and is captured by its capability sets which consist of various functioning vectors. The standard of living is then reflected in capability sets. This paper proposes some particular ways of measuring...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010300185
We study the role of an imbalance in fighting strengths when players bargain in the shadow of conflict. Our experimental results suggest: In a simple bargaining game with an exogenous mediation proposal, the likelihood of conflict is independent of the balance of power. If bargaining involves...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011301433