Showing 141 - 150 of 153
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005499951
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005546547
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005546585
Can inertia in terminating unsuccessful loans (creditor passivity) be due to the multiplicity of lenders in loan arrangements? Can a lender reschedule, betting against his odds? Private information in the form of bad but coarse news, that would prompt foreclosure on its own, will instead lead to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005738657
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005611965
In markets where product quality is important, more than one characteristic is usually necessary for producers to define product quality. Standard theory maintains that: (i) in a duopoly there will be a quality leader no matter whether the product can incorporate one or two vertical attributes;...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010738082
It is shown in this paper that there exist cost innovations for which a monopolist has a higher incentive to invest than a social planner. This unveils the limits of the claim, based on Arrow (1959), that a monopoly always has a lower incentive to innovate than a social planner and therefore...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580490
type="main" xml:id="ecca12099-abs-0001" xml:lang="en" <p>Are multiple-lender loans rescheduled more or less often than single-lender loans? Do multiple lenders react efficiently to new information? Our analysis emphasizes the role of the precision of information: lenders trade off benefits from...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038611
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005275774
We consider a market in which producers and an intermediary have perfect information about the qualities of the goods. Consumers do not observe the qualities. Producers can perfectly reveal that a good is of high quality through certification. This entails socially wasteful costs. Firms can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005227319