Similar Search Results

Lost Causes

Hoover, Kevin - In: Journal of the history of economic thought 26 (2004) 2, pp. 149-164

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007153272

A Neowicksellian in a new classical world: The methodology of michael woodford's <i>Interest and Prices<-i>

Hoover, Kevin - In: Journal of the history of economic thought 28 (2006) 2, pp. 143-150

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007261647

The rhetoric of 'Signifying nothing': a rejoinder to Ziliak and McCloskey

Hoover, Kevin; Siegler, Mark - In: The journal of economic methodology 15 (2008) 1, pp. 57-68

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007995074

Sound and fury: McCloskey and significance testing in economics

Hoover, Kevin; Siegler, Mark - In: The journal of economic methodology 15 (2008) 1, pp. 1-38

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007995076

Thomas J. Sargent and François R. Velde's The Big Problem of Small Change (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. xxii + 405, $55. IBSN 0-691-02932-6.

Hoover, Kevin - In: Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2004) 03, pp. 426-428

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008535699

Sound and fury: McCloskey and significance testing in economics

Hoover, Kevin; Siegler, Mark - In: Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2008) 1, pp. 1-37

For more than 20 years, Deidre McCloskey has campaigned to convince the economics profession that it is hopelessly confused about statistical significance. She argues that many practices associated with significance testing are bad science and that most economists routinely employ these bad...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005496129