Showing 41 - 50 of 59
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001187523
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001089285
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001038646
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001117872
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005302065
Ford et al. (this issue) point out that the SURADF panel unit root test may be sensitive to panel composition. This reply shows that they overstate the case since they focus on a short time series of 44 observations. Type II errors are much more likely in this environment so that inconsistent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005217949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007368588
A unit root testing procedure is presented that exploits the well-established power advantages of panel estimation while rectifying a deficiency in other panel unit root tests. This procedure, which takes into account contemporaneous cross-correlation and heterogeneous serial correlation of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009326016
In this paper we have tested various explanations for differences in rates of economic growth across states. We found no evidence consistent with Olson's hypothesis that differences in state age (a proxy for the strength of special interest groups) can explain differences in state growth....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864709
Similar but alternative specifications of tests of forward rate unbiasedness provide conflicting evidence on the rejection of the hypothesis. These conflicting results are reconciled by demonstrating that although the root cause is simultaneity bias, the severity of this bias and the resulting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009206844