Showing 1 - 10 of 41,789
In this paper it is shown that the combination of mental accounting and loss aversion can fundamentally changes people's way of evaluating risky alternatives. The observation is applied in a market setting: Parimutuel betting markets. In parimutuel betting markets it has been found that for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734683
Expected utility functions are limited to second-order (conditional) risk aversion, while non-expected utility functions can exhibit either first-order or second-order (conditional) risk aversion. We extend the concept of orders of conditional risk aversion to orders of conditional dependent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013127810
We consider the original Arrow-Lind framework in which a government undertakes a risky project to be shared among many taxpayers. In our model, the taxpayers decide the level of participation in the risky project. Moreover, the amount of taxes collected by the government fully finances the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091829
The term “equity premium puzzle” was coined in 1985 by economists Rajnish Mehra and Edward C. Prescott. The equity premium puzzle in considered one of the most significant questions in finance. A number of papers have explored the fundamental questions of why the premium exists and has not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906021
We consider the original Arrow-Lind framework in which a government undertakes a risky project to be shared among many taxpayers. In our model, the taxpayers decide the level of participation in the risky project. Moreover, the amount of taxes collected by the government fully finances the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013060166
The majority of risk adjusted performance measures (RAPM) currently in use – e.g., Treynor ratio, (?/?)) ratio, Omega index, RoVaR, ‘coherent’ preference criteria, etc. – are incompat- ible with any sensible utility function and would be best avoided. We argue instead for the assessment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010938095
We consider the original Arrow-Lind framework in which a government undertakes a risky project to be shared among many taxpayers. In our model, the taxpayers decide the level of participation in the risky project. Moreover, the amount of taxes collected by the government fully finances the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009391788
This paper is on decision theoretical foundations for various types of VaR models, including VaR and conditional-VaR, as objective measures of downside risk for financial prospects. We establish the connections of the VaRs with the first- and the second-order stochastic dominance investment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014057675
A stochastic solution is proposed for a general problem of demand for risks with both value-maximizing firms and risk averse agents. Explicit solutions are possible for both models when the interesting risk is perceived to be fairly-priced by the two decision makers
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013028600
Generalizations of traditional preference criteria such as the Sharpe ratio, the information ratio and the Jensen alpha are obtained by maximizing a certain equivalent excess return (CER) under relevant investment conditions. They are increasing functions of CERs and therefore equivalent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008542356