Showing 11 - 20 of 49,902
Horizontal shareholdings exist when a common set of investors own significant shares in corporations that are horizontal competitors in a product market. Economic models show that substantial horizontal shareholdings are likely to anticompetitively raise prices when the owned businesses compete...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013004193
Scholars and antitrust enforcers have raised concerns about anticompetitive effects that may arise when institutional investors hold substantial stakes in competing firms. Their concern rests on empirical evidence that such common concentrated ownership is associated with higher prices and lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851909
Some scholars have argued that the phenomenon known as common ownership, which refers to an investor's simultaneous ownership of small stockholdings in several competing companies, is anticompetitive and prohibited by the U.S. antitrust laws. These proponents target in particular large...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012920513
Common ownership fundamentally upsets the well-settled merger enforcement ecosystem. Not only it challenges basic principles informing merger policy such as the presumed profitability of mergers for the merging firms and the merger-specificity of potential efficiencies but also it works against...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013234688
Minority shareholdings have been on the regulatory agenda of competition authorities for some time. Recent empirical studies, however, draw attention to a new, thought provoking theory of harm: common ownership by institutional investors holding small, parallel equity positions in several...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013241599
A phenomenon known as “Common Ownership” arises when shareholders hold substantial stakes in competing firms. Although recent empirical evidence has illustrated how common concentrated owners are associated with higher product market prices and lower output, scholars remain divided as to the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013293643
This paper faces two questions concerning Joint Ventures (JV) agreements. First, we studyhow the partners contribution affect the creation and the profit sharing of a JV when partners'effort is not observable. Then, we see whether such agreements are easier to enforce when thedecision on JV...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005868730
This paper examines vertical relationships in which a monopolistic upstream producer supplies a product through downstream distributors to consumers who may access multiple distributors (i.e., multi-homing). Given that there are multi-homing consumers, exclusive supply of a product induces more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012840027
This paper addresses two questions concerning Joint Venture (JV) agreements. We first study the formation and the performance of a JV when the partners' contribution has a different impact on the JV profits. Then, we check whether the JV is more likely as well as the welfare level improves when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012766504
We analyze a model of cost-reducing R&D and compatibility decisions by two platforms. After an exogenous improvement in the efficiency of R&D, each platform has a heightened incentive to make its software incompatible with the rival's hardware device to avoid being dominated in the hardware...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012968151