Showing 61 - 70 of 490
We determine the scoring rule that is most likely to select a high-ability candidate. A major result is that neither the widely used plurality rule nor the inverse-plurality rule are ever optimal, and that the Borda rule is hardly ever optimal. Furthermore, we show that only the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011795205
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012434391
This paper merges the non-expected utility approach (Tversky and Kahneman, J Risk Uncertain 5:297–323, <CitationRef CitationID="CR17">1992</CitationRef> and Quiggin, J Econ Behav Organ 3:323–343, <CitationRef CitationID="CR14">1982</CitationRef>) into Akerlof’s (Quart J Econ 84:488–500, <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">1970</CitationRef>) model of Market for Lemons. We derive the results for different probability...</citationref></citationref></citationref>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010988765
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369470
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006031259
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008230345
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007733698
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007648878
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010177188
This paper merges the non-expected utility approach (Tversky and Kahneman (1992) and Quiggin (1982)) into Akerlof's (1970) model of "Market for lemons". Our main finding suggests that when the proportion of traded "lemons" is high (low), the problem of market failure is mitigated (enhanced). We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014200895