Similar Search Results

Dividing Justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims: Normative Judgments and Actual Negotiations

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - 2004

Theoretical research on claims problems has concentrated on normative properties and axiomatizations of solution concepts. We complement these analyses by empirical evidence on the predictability of three classical solution concepts in a bankruptcy problem. We examine both people's impartial...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010262122

Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - 2004

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011335222

Dividing justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - 2004

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325555

Dividing justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - Tinbergen Institute - 2004

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005137047

Dividing justly in Bargaining Problems with Claims

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - Tinbergen Instituut - 2004

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011257568

Moral entitlements and aspiration formation in asymmetric bargaining : experimental evidence from Germany and China

Hennig-Schmidt, Heike; Walkowitz, Gari - In: Games 8 (2017) 4, pp. 1-25

Using a unique experimental data set, we investigate how asymmetric legal rights shape bargainers’ aspiration levels through moral entitlements derived from equity norms and number prominence. Aspiration formation is typically hard to observe in real life. Our study involves 15 negotiations...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011771180

Fairness and transparency in one-to-many bargaining with complementarity : an experimental study

Mak, Vincent; Zwick, Rami - In: Games 15 (2024) 4, pp. 1-29

complementarity and how it is influenced by fairness concern and information transparency. We base our setup on a structured … value of the deal approximately half-half with the buyer as a normative fairness benchmark. The buyers, on the other hand …, did not have a demand for fairness that was based on a fairness benchmark. …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015073214

Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - 2003

In many business transactions, in labor-management relations, in internationalconflicts, and welfare state reforms bargainers hold strong entitlements that are oftengenerated by claims that are not feasible any more. These entitlements seem to considerablyshape negotiation behavior. By using the...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011333887

Moral property rights in bargaining

Gächter, Simon; Riedl, Arno - 2002

In many business transactions, in labor-management relations, in international conflicts, and welfare state reforms claims acquired in the past seem to create strong entitlements that shape current negotiations. Despite their importance, the role of entitlements in negotiations has not received...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409699

Moral entitlements and aspiration formation in asymmetric bargaining: Experimental evidence from Germany and China

Hennig-Schmidt, Heike; Walkowitz, Gari - In: Games 8 (2017) 4, pp. 1-25

Using a unique experimental data set, we investigate how asymmetric legal rights shape bargainers' aspiration levels through moral entitlements derived from equity norms and number prominence. Aspiration formation is typically hard to observe in real life. Our study involves 15 negotiations from...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011852710

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
Last