Showing 21 - 30 of 1,510
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003388742
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013424292
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013424637
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261322
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005765966
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005497776
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Our approach has a number of novel features. First, we focus on the interrelationship between trade costs, the trade account and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005687313
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005715192
In this paper we test the well-known hypothesis of Obstfeld and Rogoff (2000) that trade costs are the key to explaining the so-called Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. Using a gravity framework in an intertemporal context, we provide strong support for the hypothesis and we reconcile our results with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013318280
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003829128