Showing 31 - 40 of 1,832
In a public goods experiment, subjects can vary over a period of stochasticlength two contribution levels: one is publicly observable (their cheap talkstated intention), while the other is not seen by the others (their secretintention). When the period suddenly stops, participants are restricted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866575
Does geographic distance or the perceived social distance between subjects significantlyaffect proposer and responder behavior in ultimatum bargaining? To answer this question,subjects play a one-shot ultimatum game with three players (proposer, responder, and apassive dummy player) and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866606
We study an ultimatum experiment in which the responder does not know the offer when accepting or rejecting. Unconditional veto power leads to acceptances, although proposers are significantly greedier than in standard ultimatum games, and this is anticipated by responders.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866673
Collusive agreements are often observed in procurement auctions. They are probablymore easily achieved when competitors’ costs are easily estimated. If, however, the individualcosts of bidders are private information, effective ring formation is difficult to realize.We compare experimentally...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866708
For given product specifications by two competing firms the demand levels are determined by a randomly generated ideal composition of aspects. Firms can vary some demand. Although the product space is much too large to be explored systematically, we expect (and test for) rather reasonable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866858
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581455
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001913668
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001891536
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003882882
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009129807