Showing 1 - 10 of 476
We examine the evolution of marginal federal income tax rates from 1980 to 1995 using panel and cross-sectional data. Marginal rates fell dramatically for most taxpayers. Whereas in 1980 three-quarters of taxpayers faced statutory tax rates above 15 percent, less than one-quarter of taxpayers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010788396
We examine retirement savers’ choices between front-and back-loaded tax incentives, such as traditional and Roth IRAs. With equal dollar contribution limits, back-loaded plans shelter more funds than front-loaded plans. This implies that Roth IRAs can be the preferred choice even for investors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010788478
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001338615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001620925
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006700373
We examine retirement savers' choices between front- and back-loaded tax incentives, such as traditional and Roth IRAs, respectively. With equal dollar contribution limits, back-loaded plans shelter more funds than front-loaded plans. This implies that Roth IRAs can be the preferred choice even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012742333
We examine the evolution of marginal federal income tax rates from 1980 to 1995 using panel and crosssectional data. Marginal rates fell dramatically for most taxpayers. Whereas in 1980 three-quarters of taxpayers faced statutory tax rates above 15 percent, less than one-quarter of taxpayers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013050726
We examine retirement savers' choices between front- and back-loaded tax incentives, such as traditional and Roth IRAs, respectively. With equal dollar contribution limits, back-loaded plans shelter more funds than front-loaded plans. This implies that Roth IRAs can be the preferred choice even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012783944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003308428
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013548746