Showing 1,251 - 1,260 of 1,270
This paper develops an adverse selection model which uncovers two mechanisms whereby Grameen-style peer grouping systems can trigger lower interest rates. In one extreme scenario, where participant borrowers do not have prior information about the type of their peers, lower interest rate are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005634880
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005635851
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005224502
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005228374
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005231899
This paper develops an adverse selection model where peer group systems are shown to trigger lower interest rates and remove credit rationing in the case where borrowers are uninformed about their potential partners and ex post state verification (or auditing) by banks is costly. Peer group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005232279
The assumption usually made in the insurance literature that risks are always insurable at the desired level does not hold in the real world: some risks are not—or are only partially—insurable, while others, such as civil liability or health and workers' injuries, must be fully insured or at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005117088
In this paper we propose an answer to the following problem of comparative statics in models with multiple sources of risk: How a risk averse agent will change his coinsurance demand when the distribution of the insurable loss is shifted? To answer the question, we first comment on Jack Meyer's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005117091
We propose a new decision criterion under risk in which people extract both utility from anticipatory feelings ex ante and disutility from disappointment ex post. The decision maker chooses his degree of optimism, given that more optimism raises both the utility of ex ante feelings and the risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005120773
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005564588