Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003907484
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009573133
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010006571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009932628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009502673
This is the first comprehensive examination of the stock option backdating litigation. One reason why it is important to study the stock option backdating litigation is that it was a blend of financial reporting fraud and executive misappropriation of assets. Sometimes the executive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013000478
Criminal prosecution of financial reporting-related corporate misconduct is generally acknowledged to be sometimes warranted. The decision to seek an indictment of Arthur Andersen remains controversial, however. Eisenberg and Macey (2004) posit that because the resulting increased concentration...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012737114
The largest CPA firms have been regarded as quality-differentiated auditors. This has been a prominent assumption of empirical research in accounting and auditing. Yet, prior research has only tested whether the largest CPA firms, in the aggregate, are quality-differentiated auditors. This paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012738918
This study extends the Palmrose and Scholz (2004) general litigation and general restatements study by focusing on auditor litigation and revenue restatements. We investigate all potential accounting issues, individually, instead of by their group method, with regard to auditor litigation. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938002
We provide evidence of the impact of Auditing Standard No. 2 (“AS 2”), issued pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SarBox”), on the outcome of auditors in financial reporting litigation. Specifically, we focus on the existence of financial restatements and how and why they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013049126