Showing 21 - 30 of 309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001155352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001856275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001237539
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001060366
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001230556
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001339891
We analyze whether the use of breakup fees by an incumbent might induce an inefficient allocation of consumers and possibly foreclose efficient entry where buyers are non-pivotal (infinitesimal) and have to pay switching costs if they switch from the incumbent to an entrant. When the entrants...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011301378
We consider a simple two period model where consumers have different switching costs. Before the market opens, there was an incumbent who sold to all consumers. We identify the equilibrium both with Stackelberg and Bertrand competition and show how the presence of low switching cost consumers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333432
Considering markets with non-pivotal buyers we analyze the anti-competitive effects of breakup fees used by an incumbent facing a more efficient entrant in the future. Buyers differ in their intrinsic switching costs. Breakup fees are profitably used to foreclose entry, regardless of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011595112
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012093583