Showing 31 - 40 of 157
This paper addresses the issue of the choice of the optimalinstrument to sell new shares, this choice being price versusquantity discrimination (rationing). Previous results in theliterature (Benveniste and Wilhelm, 1990) show that the issuing firmwould be better off if allowed to use both price...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325003
We analyze the dynamics of takeover contests where hostile raiders compete against white knights involved by a lead blockholder of the target firm (the incumbent). We assume that the incumbent has the power to bargain with the potential bidders to set a minimum takeover price. We characterize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325684
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003313973
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003347006
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003864810
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003813721
We analyze the dynamics of takeover contests where hostile raiders compete against white knights involved by a lead blockholder of the target firm (the incumbent). We assume that the incumbent has the power to bargain with the potential bidders to set a minimum takeover price. We characterize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011377390
This paper addresses the issue of the choice of the optimalinstrument to sell new shares, this choice being price versusquantity discrimination (rationing). Previous results in theliterature (Benveniste and Wilhelm, 1990) show that the issuing firmwould be better off if allowed to use both price...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317445
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010382657
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003802490