Showing 11 - 20 of 714
We consider bargaining games under the assumption that bargainers are loss averse, i.e. experience disutility from obtaining an outcome lower than some reference point. We follow the approach of Shalev (2002) by imposing the self-supporting condition on a solution. Given a bargaining game, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005079018
In this paper we study the effect of information on the occurrence of intentional price wars on the equilibrium path. An episode of low prices is an intentional price war if it follows a period of high prices which was ended intentionally by one of the firms in the market (the price war leader)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008465407
Following Vartiainen (2007) we consider bargaining problems in which no exogenous disagreement outcome is given. A bargaining solution assigns a pair of outcomes to such a problem, namely a compromise outcome as well as a disagreement outcome: the interpretation is that the latter results if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008540709
Following prospect theory we consider decision making under risk in which the decision maker''s preferences depend on a reference outcome. An outcome below this reference outcome is regarded as resulting from a loss: a loss decreases the decision maker''s basic utility more than a comparable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008765741
The classical bankruptcy problem (O''Neill, 1982) is extended by assuming that the agents have non-homogenous preferences over several estates. A special case is the one in which there are finitely many estates and the agents have homogenous preferences, i.e., constant utilities, per estate. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008642578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408691
Collective decisions are modeled by preference correspondences (rules). In particular, we focus ona new condition: "update monotonicity" for preference rules. Although many so-called impossibilitytheorems for the choice rules are based on -or related to- monotonicity conditions, this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011146981
Impossibility theorems for preference correspondences based on a new monotonicity concept arediscussed. Here monotonicity means that if preferences update in such a way that they get closerto an outcome then at the new situation this outcome remains chosen. Strong monotonicity requiresfurther...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011147012
We study sets of preferences that are convex with respect to the betweeness relation induced by the Kemeny distance for preferences. It appears that these sets consist of all preferences containing a certain partial ordering and the other way around all preferences containing a given partial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011160202
Domains of individual preferences for which the well-known impossibility theorems of Gibbard-Satterthwaite and Muller-Satterthwaite do not hold are studied. To comprehend the limitations these results imply for social choice rules, we search for the largest domains that are possible. Here, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011160211