Showing 1 - 10 of 17,918
This paper addresses the question as to whether it is optimal to use separating or pooling nonlinear income taxation, or to use linear income taxation, when the government cannot commit to its future tax policy. We consider both two-period and infinite-horizon settings. Under empirically...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008495304
probability that the government cannot commit to its future tax policy. In this "loose commitment" environment, we find that even … commitment is higher than 98%. Loose commitment also reverses the short-run welfare effects of changes in most model parameters … commitment is modelled as a Markov switching process. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008679107
-consistent taxation of annual income can also welfare-dominate taxation of lifetime income under commitment. These findings may help in …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010270135
Despite using a variety of models and assumptions, the existing literature has overwhelmingly concluded that education policy should be regressive. In this paper, we examine a two-period model in which the government may impose non- linear taxes on both labour income and education expenditures....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010614227
This paper examines a dynamic model of nonlinear income taxation in which the government cannot commit to its future tax policy, and individuals are quasi-hyperbolic discounters who cannot commit to future consumption plans. The government has both paternalistic and redistributive objectives,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010901475
It has recently been shown that incorporating "keeping up with the Joneses" preferences into a prototypical two-ability-type optimal nonlinear taxation model leads to higher marginal income tax rates for both types of agents. Specifically, the high-skill type faces a positive marginal income tax...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004979873
This paper examines a dynamic model of nonlinear income taxation in which the government cannot commit to its future tax policy, and individuals are quasi-hyperbolic discounters who cannot commit to future consumption plans. The government uses its taxation powers to maximise a utilitarian...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009193297
This paper examines a dynamic model of nonlinear income taxation in which the government cannot commit to its future tax policy, and individuals are quasi-hyperbolic discounters who cannot commit to future consumption plans. The government has both paternalistic and redistributive objectives,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011190120
This paper considers education investment and public education policy in closed and open economies with an extortionary government. The extortionary government in a closed economy chooses an education policy in order to overcome a hold-up problem of time-consistent taxation similar to benevolent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010306979
This paper compares education investment in closed and open economies without government and with a benevolent government. Closed economies suffer from a holdup problem of excessive redistribution, and governments use education policy as a second-best tool. Globalization that increases labor...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010307013