Showing 41 - 50 of 1,805
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011482517
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003003305
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001601787
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001601800
To broaden the operational scope of monetary policy, several authors suggest cash abolishment as an appropriate means of breaking through the zero lower bound. The key question in this respect is: What are the costs of such a proposal? We argue that the welfare costs of bypassing the zero lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011691585
To broaden the operational scope of monetary policy, several authors suggest cash abolition as an appropriate means of breaking through the zero lower-bound. We argue that the welfare costs of bypassing the zero lower-bound by getting rid of cash entirely are analytically equivalent to negative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012025377
To broaden the scope of monetary policy, cash abolishment is often suggested as a means of breaking through the zero lower bound. However, practically nothing is said about the welfare costs of such a proposal. Rösl, Seitz and Tödter argue that the welfare costs of bypassing the zero lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011635370
To broaden the operational scope of monetary policy, several authors suggest cash abolishment as an appropriate means of breaking through the zero lower bound. The key question in this respect is: What are the costs of such a proposal? We argue that the welfare costs of bypassing the zero lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011641141
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007434163
In this comment, we answer the question posed in Svensson's (2000) paper 'Does the P* Model Provide any Rationale for Monetary Targeting?'- in contrast to him -- in the affirmative. We argue that a strategy of monetary targeting can be rationalized within the P* framework. Furthermore, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005164839