Showing 1 - 10 of 151
In an insightful article published in this journal, Alan Musgrave (1981) has argued that once we distinguish between three kinds of assumptions, Milton Friedman's F-twist--according to which the truth of the assumptions of an economic theory is irrelevant to its acceptability--can be untwisted....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005321175
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007495369
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007404904
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007404905
The implications of scientific realism in regard to economics depend on what one takes scientific realism to mean and on whether one lets its contents to depend on the peculiar characteristics of the discipline of economics. Here a revisionist line is adopted and scientific realism is reduced to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215343
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215372
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219453
The paper questions Weintraub's thesis that 'Methodology doesn't matter'. It is argued that the thesis is unclear, and when clarified on the basis of textual evidence from Weintraub himself, it is false (or else trivially true). It is also pointed out that Weintraub's argument for the thesis is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219480
This is a paper on interdisciplinarity and rhetoric. Neuroeconomics is hype, but this does not rule out entertaining hopes about its capacity to produce some desirable consequences. Its 'disciplinary conventions' are characterized as those of a young interdisciplinary field. Its rhetorical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008691582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008155121