Showing 81 - 90 of 11,011
We compare the two most common bidding processes for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly to buyers. In an auction all entry decisions are made prior to any bidding. In a sequential bidding earlier entrants can make bids before later entrants choose whether to compete....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010604887
This paper analyzes a model of preemptive jump bidding in private value takeover auctions with entry costs. It shows that when the second bidder owns a fraction of the target firm preemptive jump bidding leads to a higher social surplus, improves the expected profit of both bidders and reduces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010753549
This paper reports findings of two field studies, conducted on a local online auction website, that compare bidding strategies in charity and non-charity auctions, focusing on the extent of jump bidding at different stages of auctions. Results indicate that jump bidding is negatively correlated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010867846
We compare the most common methods for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly: a simple simultaneous auction, and a sequential process in which potential buyers decide in turn whether or not to enter the bidding. The sequential process is always more efficient. But...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008469677
We compare the most common methods for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly: a simple simultaneous auction, and a sequential process in which potential buyers decide in turn whether or not to enter the bidding. The sequential process is always more efficient. But...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004976795
We compare the two most common bidding processes for selling a company or other asset when participation is costly to buyers. In an auction all entry decisions are made prior to any bidding. In a sequential bidding process earlier entrants can make bids before later entrants choose whether to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005123726
This paper examines how a bidder can benefit from jump bidding by using the jump bid as a signal of a high valuation which causes other bidders to drop out of the auction earlier than they would otherwise. The information contained in a jump bid must be sufficient to induce a discrete change in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005653207
This paper extends Fishman's (1988) model of preemptive bidding in takeover auctions to auctions with affiliated values. It shows that preemptive bidding transfers wealth from the seller to the first bidder without affecting the profit of the second bidder and social welfare. It also shows that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010602930
This paper presents a model of preemptive bidding in takeover auctions with toeholds. It shows that when the first bidder owns a fraction of the target firm he is more likely to deter competition and a smaller jump bid is required to do so. It also shows that in the presence of the toehold, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580456
This paper analyzes the preemptive jump bidding equilibrium in takeover auctions when the acquisition of the target firm by one of the bidders may affect the profit of the other bidder. It shows that such externality has no effect on the preemption rate but affects the size of the jump bid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010703278