Showing 131 - 140 of 217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005153425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007331345
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007419680
Previous research has shown that individuals do not respond to changes in their bargaining position to the extent predicted by standard bargaining theories. Most of these results come from experiments with bargaining power allocated exogenously, so that individuals may perceive it as having been...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009652261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215408
That researchers look for the inverted-U shape in inequality in the arbitrary periods of arbitrary countries underlies the divergent empirical evidence across studies. To point to the right context for the pattern, this paper establishes a formal mechanism in line with Kuznets' explanation that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219580
We use a human–subjects experiment to investigate how bargaining outcomes are affected by changes in bargainers’disagreement payoffs. Subjects bargain against changing opponents, with an asymmetric disagreement outcome that varies over plays of the game. Both bargaining parties are informed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009394007
We use a laboratory experiment to study bargaining in the presence of random arbitration. Two players make simultaneous demands; if compatible, each receives the amount demanded as in the standard Nash demand game. If bargainers’ demands are incompatible, then rather than bargainers receiving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009394015
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009403157
This paper looks at household welfare distribution among two-income couples from three social strata in Izmir, Turkey. A simple explicit two-stage dynamic game theory model is developed to determine if an egalitarian intra-household distribution under certain circumstances is consistent even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009641933