Showing 151 - 160 of 203
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012817040
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012307944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012311853
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012205392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012205501
This paper examines the effect of commercial bank entry on underwriting spreads for IPOs, SEOs, and debt issues using a long time series that spans 30 years, from 1975 to 2004. We find that, on average, commercial banks charge lower spreads of approximately 72 basis points for IPOs, 43 basis...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909349
This paper reexamines the explanatory power of beta, firm size, book-to-market equity, and the earnings-price ratio for average stock returns, correcting two currently controversial biases: selection bias in COMPUSTAT and the errors-in-variables (EIV) bias. After filling in the missing data on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012790798
This paper reexamines the explanatory power of beta, firm size, book-to-market equity, and earnings-price ratio to average stock returns with correcting two currently controversial biases: the selection bias in COMPUSTAT and the errors-in-variables (EIV) problem. The selection bias is corrected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012791121
Recent research has documented the failure of market beta to capture the cross-section of expected returns within the context of a two-pass estimation methodology. However, the two-pass methodology suffers from the errors-in-variables (EIV) problem that could attenuate the apparent significance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012791560
This article compares econometric model specifications that have been proposed to explain the commonly observed characteristics of the unconditional distribution of daily stock returns. The empirical results indicate that the most likely ranking is (1) intertemporal dependence models, (2)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012790207