Showing 131 - 140 of 149
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005755634
We show that the Owen value for TU games with a cooperation structure extends the Shapley value in a consistent way. In particular, the Shapley value is the expected Owen value for all symmetric distributions on the partitions of the player set. Similar extensions of the Banzhaf value do not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008475664
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005004440
In this paper, we introduce a component efficient value for TU games with a coalition structure which reflects the outside options of players within the same structural coalition. It is based on the idea that splitting a coalition should affect players who stay together in the same way. We show...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408632
We provide new characterisations of the equal surplus division value. This way, the difference between the Shapley value, the equal surplus division value, and the equal division value is pinpointed to one axiom.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010743700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008926027
We suggest new characterizations of the Banzhaf value without the symmetry axiom, which reveal that the characterizations by Lehrer (1988, International Journal of Game Theory 17, 89-99) and Nowak (1997, International Journal of Game Theory 26, 127-141) as well as most of the characterizations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008764997
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008673726
We study values for transferable utility games enriched by a communication graph (CO-games) where the graph does not necessarily a¤ect the productivity but can in?uence the way the players distribute the worth generated by the grand coalition. Thus, we can envisage values that are efficient...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011183207
We provide a new interpretation of the potential of the Shapley value as the expected worth of some random partition of the player set. Using this insight, we advocate the potential as an index of power concentration in simple monotonic games.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011076560