Showing 1 - 10 of 10,926
the rating and the underlying decision processes of the respondents. Selected implications for researchers and higher …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010421341
the rating and the underlying decision processes of the respondents. Selected implications for researchers and higher …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010615525
An important recent event in the economics field is the introduction of seven new society journals. Using standard iterative ranking methodologies from economics, as well as some new methodologies, we demonstrate the spectacular rise of these journals while updating journal rankings for all...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014377240
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010359781
The paper analyses academic journal quality and research impact using quality weighted citations versus total citations, based on the widely-used Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (ISI). A new Index of Citations Quality (ICQ) is presented, based on quality weighted citations....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010246747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010348325
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011508138
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010422072
Virtually all rankings of journals are based on citations, including self citations by journals and individual academics. The gold standard for bibliometric rankings based on citations data is the widely-used Thomson Reuters Web of Science (2014) citations database, which publishes, among...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010504012
The premise underlying the use of citations data is that higher quality journals generally have a higher number of citations. The impact of citations can be distorted in a number of ways. Journals can, and do, inflate the number of citations through self citation practices, which may be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010464786