Showing 1 - 10 of 6,569
Impulsivity and inconsistency in intertemporal choice have been attracting attention in econophysics and neuroeconomics … choice. Recent studies using Tsallis’ statistics-based econophysics have found a discount function (i.e. q …, researchers in neuroeconomics and psychopharmacology have usually studied impulsivity in intertemporal choice using a discount …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011062322
discounting process and, by integration, obtain other main quantities like impulsivity and discount functions. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011064364
Intertemporal choice and psychophysics of time perception have been attracting attention in econophysics and … (exponential discounting with logarithmic time perception of the Weber–Fechner law, a q-exponential discount model based on Tsallis …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010589624
Impulsivity and inconsistency in intertemporal choice (discounting) have drawn attention in econophysics and … impulsivity in choices for oneself versus someone else, we experimentally estimated the consistency parameter q in Tsallis …) impulsivity, distinguished from inconsistency by utilizing the Tsallis statistics-based q-exponential discount function, is also …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011058427
Intertemporal choice has drawn attention in econophysics and neuroeconomics. Both impulsivity and inconsistency in … intertemporal choice can be parametrized with a Tsallis’s statistics-based q-exponential discount model. Although a recent …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011060785
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011521418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014444203
The author argues that it is microeconomics that needs foundations, not macroeconomics. Preferences need to be built on biology, and, in particular, on neuroscience. In contrast, macroeconomics could benefit from rationalizations of aggregate economic phenomena by non-equilibrium statistical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010298584
I argue that it is microeconomics that needs foundations, not macroeconomics. Preferences need to be built on biology, and, in particular, on neuroscience. In contrast, macroeconomics could benefit from rationalizations of aggregate economic phenomena by non-equilibrium statistical physics.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010298641
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009663242