Showing 41 - 50 of 165
This paper defends a materialist analysis of employment relations against two recent critiques, by Peter Ackers and Patrick McGovern. 'Radical pluralism' is Ackers's preferred term. The critiques are useful in exposing some ritualistic uses of terms such as conflict, contradiction, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010380988
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002107719
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003359907
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001411921
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009777069
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009540784
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003782639
Huw Beynon's Working for Ford achieved celebrity when published in 1973. An assessment 40 years later identifies the lasting value of the book. Though written from a clearly stated point of view, it did not present a biased account, and it included much information permitting alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012010541
The concept of a 'structured antagonism' in the workplace, introduced in 1986, is revisited and extended. Part of the revisiting clears up misunderstandings about the idea which have arisen as a result of its being cited without always being fully understood. The core idea, that the SA exists...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011961909
Organizational neuroscience (ON) is a rapidly emerging sub-field. Criticisms of its reductionism are common. Yet it is possible for practitioners and critics to engage. Such engagement is facilitated by realism. It agrees with the practitioners of ON that brain functions can in principle be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012011698