Showing 86,601 - 86,610 of 87,053
This paper presents preliminary results from a pilot experiment dealing with the economic motivations to contribute to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013067277
-scale experiment. Choices react significantly to the stakes and to the size of the choice set. Our experiment rationalizes the gender …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013103490
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013256836
a previous experiment using the same design Brueggemann et al. (2016) showed that the noIP regime significantly … our experiment seems not to reward the best players, but the players choosing an 'autarkic' strategy of relying on their …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013291953
This paper exploits a large dataset of replications of the Holt and Laury (2002) risk elicitation task to study a possible outcome reporting bias using gender differences in risk attitudes. There is a strong consensus view in the experimental literature according to which women are more prudent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013315692
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013548845
-scale experiment. Choices react significantly to the stakes and to the size of the choice set. Our experiment rationalizes the gender …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014040558
This paper reconsiders the wide agreement that females are more risk averse than males providing a leap forward in its understanding. Thoroughly surveying the literature we first find that gender differences are less ubiquitous than usually depicted. Gathering the microdata of an even larger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014148140
-scale experiment, although the task can be performed in the field as well. Choices react significantly to the stakes and to the size of … the choice set. Our experiment rationalizes the gender gap that often characterizes choices under uncertainty by means of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014163274
We study conditional cooperation based on a sequential two-person linear public good game in which a trusting first contributor can be exploited by a second contributor. After playing this game the first contributor is allowed to punish the second contributor. The consequences of sanctioning...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014166938