Showing 1 - 10 of 665
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009522309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010205371
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011742055
We provide one of the first large sample comparisons of cash policies in public and private U.S. firms. We first show that on average private firms hold less than half as much cash as public firms do. The higher cash holdings of public firms are partially caused by the fact that public firms add...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115426
We provide one of the first large sample comparisons of cash policies in public and private U.S. firms. We first show that despite higher financing frictions, private firms hold, on average, about half as much cash as public firms do. By examining the drivers of cash policies for each group, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091346
We study large discrete decreases in CEO pay and compare them to CEO forced turnover. The determinants are similar, as are the performance improvements after the action. After the pay cut, the CEO pay-for-performance sensitivity is abnormally high, such that the CEO can restore his pay level by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012712362
We compare CEO turnover in public and large private firms. Public firms have higher turnover rates and exhibit greater turnover-performance sensitivities than private firms. Controlling for pre-turnover performance, performance improvements are greater for private firms than for public firms. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013034430
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009836266
We provide one of the first large sample comparisons of cash policies in public and private U.S. firms. We first show that despite higher financing frictions, private firms hold, on average, about half as much cash as public firms do. By examining the drivers of cash policies for each group, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010681719
We study large discrete decreases in CEO pay and compare them to CEO forced turnover. The determinants are similar, as are the performance improvements after the action. After the pay cut, the CEO pay-for-performance sensitivity is abnormally high, such that the CEO can restore his pay level by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010574254