Showing 21 - 30 of 967
Experimental research on decision making under risk has until now always employed choice data in order to evaluate the empirical performance of expected utility and the alternative non-expected utility theories. The present paper performs a similar analysis which relies on pricing data instead...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005110673
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008527128
In the context of eliciting preferences for decision making under risk, we ask the question: "which might be the 'best' method for eliciting such preferences?". It is well known that different methods differ in terms of the bias in the elicitation; it is rather less well-known that different...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005170097
Experimental research on decision making under risk has until now always employed choice data in order to evaluate the empirical performance of expected utility and the alternative non-expected utility theories. The present paper performs a similar analysis which relies on pricing data instead...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005464744
Experimental research on decision making under risk has until now always employed choice data in order to evaluate the empirical performance of expected utility and the alternative non-expected utility theories. The present paper performs a similar analysis which relies on pricing data instead...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011165898
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000429562
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003765337
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009547256
In his ‘Simple model of herd behaviour’, Banerjee (1992) shows that – in a sequential game – if the first two players have chosen the same action, all subsequent players will ignore their own information and start a herd, an irreversible one. The points of strength of Banerjee’s model...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011523582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009296718