Showing 51 - 60 of 28,130
Privatization of public law dispute resolution in workplaces has been under intense scrutiny in the context of arbitration. Another kind of workplace dispute privatization is presently underway, or under serious consideration, in several states. In connection with state workers' compensation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013001839
The Federal Circuits have generally held that ERISA prohibits waivers of claims to vested pension benefits. The D.C. Circuit prohibits waivers of vesting rights. The Seventh Circuit prohibits waivers of vested pension benefits, but allows individuals to settle non-pension disputes by choosing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012778111
This article examines the recent trend of transferring employer retiree health care liabilities to VEBAs. After providing a brief history of retiree health benefits and an overview of the basic tax rules governing VEBAs, the article explains the difference between traditional VEBAs and the new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012764858
In Metropolitan Life v. Drainville, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63613 (DC R.I. July 23, 2009), a federal district court in Rhode Island recently explained the requirements that a domestic relations order ("DRO") must satisfy to be a qualified domestic relation order (“QDRO”). The court held an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857625
In Kennedy v. DuPont Savings and Investment Plan (the quot;DuPont Planquot;), 2009 U.S. LEXIS 869 (January 26, 2009) the Supreme Court appeared to proclaim a quot;bright-line rulequot; that plan documents determine ERISA plan distributions. However, the Court blurred the bright-line rules...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012719045
In Kennedy v. DuPont Savings and Investment Plan (the quot;DuPont Planquot;), 2009 U.S. LEXIS 869 (January 26, 2009), the Supreme Court decided that if a voluntary disclaimer in a domestic relations order (quot;DROquot;) by the divorcing spouse of an ERISA pension plan participant did not comply...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012719492
ERISA preemption of state laws is determined using the following three rules. First, ERISA permits state laws that do not diminish or enhance any of the ERISA basic benefit protections. Second, ERISA preempts any state law that diminishes or enhances any of the three ERISA basic benefit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014143920
On March 1, 2016, the Supreme Court held, in Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., (“Gobeille”), that ERISA preempted a Vermont law to the extent the Vermont law requires an ERISA plan, its third party administrator, or its insurer to report benefit payments and other information relating to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014125062
Polish Abstract: Procedura administracyjna ubiegania się o świadczenie emerytalne w ZUS nie jest przejrzysta. Zauważa się, że Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych stosuje wobec swoich klientów podwójne standardy - jeden wynikający z ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013405841
In Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment Plan, (argued Oct. 7, 2008) (No. 07-636) the Supreme Court will decide whether a participant's divorcing spouse may waive her entitlement to the participant's death benefit without using a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014210753