Showing 1 - 10 of 99
Trade liberalization is no Pareto-improvement - there are winners (high-skilled) and losers (low-skilled). To compensate the losers the government is assumed to introduce unemployment benefits (UB). These benefits are financed by either a wage tax, a payroll tax, or a profit tax. Using a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011374347
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011621245
What are the effects of firm- and sector-level trade unions on unemployment and aggregate output if individuals have rent-sharing motives? To answer this question, we extend a Melitz-type model to unionized labor markets. Because individual rent-sharing motives are only taken into account and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011299454
How does a redistribution of trade gains affect welfare when income inequality matters? To answer this question, we extend the [1] model to unionized labor markets and heterogeneous workers. As redistribution schemes, we consider unemployment benefits that are financed either by a wage tax, a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011380024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009683943
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011486624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012037543
In a Cournot-oligopoly with free but costly entry and business stealing, output per firm is too low and the number of competitors excessive, assuming labor productivity to depend on the number of employees only or to be constant. However, a firm can raise the productivity of its workforce by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012015904
Trade unions are often argued to cause allocative inefficiencies and to lower welfare. We analyze whether this evaluation is also justified in a Cournot-oligopoly with free but costly entry. If input markets are competitive and output per firm declines with the number of firms (business...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012024580
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012126989