Showing 101 - 110 of 652
We examine (1) how value premiums vary with firm size, (2) whether the CAPM explains value premiums, and (3) whether, in general, average returns compensate β in the way predicted by the CAPM. <link rid="b14">Loughran's (1997)</link> evidence for a weak value premium among large firms is special to 1963 to 1995, U.S....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005303030
The proportion of U.S. firms paying dividends drops sharply during the 1980s and 1990s. Among NYSE, AMEX, and Nasdaq firms, the proportion of dividend payers falls from 66.5% in 1978 to only 20.8% in 1999. The decline is due in part to an avalanche of new listings that tilts the population of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005315267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005362564
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005362585
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005362679
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005376563
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005376578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005376651
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005210525
The value premium in U.S. stock returns is robust. The positive relation between average return and book-to-market equity is as strong for 1929 to 1963 as for the subsequent period studied in previous papers. A three-factor risk model explains the value premium better than the hypothesis that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005214776