Showing 1 - 10 of 564
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009157158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010513961
A long tradition suggests a fundamental distinction between situations of risk, where true objective probabilities are known, and unmeasurable uncertainties where no such probabilities are given. This distinction can be captured in a Bayesian model where uncertainty is represented by the agent's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009768035
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003721907
A long tradition suggests a fundamental distinction between situations of risk, where true objective probabilities are known, and unmeasurable uncertainties where no such probabilities are given. This distinction can be captured in a Bayesian model where uncertainty is represented by the agent's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010210864
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008744215
We study the problem of testing an expert whose theory has a learnable and predictive parametric representation, as do standard processes used in statistics. We design a test in which the expert is required to submit a date T by which he will have learned enough to deliver a sharp, testable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014172004
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005708238
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008783080
We provide a critical assessment of the ambiguity aversion literature, which we characterize in terms of the view that Ellsberg choices are rational responses to ambiguity, to be explained by relaxing Savage's Sure-Thing principle and adding an ambiguity-aversion postulate. First, admitting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008783177