Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009244405
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011378114
This study surveys and evaluates previous attempts to use game theory to explain the strategic dynamic of the Cuban missile crisis, including, but not limited to, explanations developed in the style of Thomas Schelling, Nigel Howard and Steven Brams. All of the explanations were judged to be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010345678
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011668167
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014526554
Many game-theoretic analyses of deterrence confirm the commonsense view that what determines whether a defender can effectively deter a challenger from an unwanted action is (1) the challenger’s perception of the level of punishment that the defender will be able to impose on the challenger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014617988
This study surveys and evaluates previous attempts to use game theory to explain the strategic dynamic of the Cuban missile crisis, including, but not limited to, explanations developed in the style of Thomas Schelling, Nigel Howard and Steven Brams. All of the explanations were judged to be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369335
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002021967
This article uses a game-theoretic framework to evaluate the decision of the Nixon Administration to place United States forces on a world-wide alert to deter Soviet intervention in the October 1973 war in the Middle East. It finds that the alert decision can be justified and explained if the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010792902
A multi-stage escalation model is developed in which each stage is taken as a psychologically distinct and empirically feasible mode of conflict available to two states in a hostile, deterrent relationship. Each stage is defined by a generic, extensive-form game of mutual deterrence in which the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795788