Showing 1 - 10 of 23
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001096871
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001072694
The issues involved in deciding whose preferences are to be counted in cost-benefit analysis are often misunderstood or controversial. This paper attempts to resolve the issues in a number of particular cases by looking to the fundamental value assumptions underlying cost-benefit analysis....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008644726
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008646082
The main objective of the paper is to decipher the military expenditure--economic growth relationship, taking the level of economic development (income) into consideration. Our findings suggest the following: (i) military expenditure has a significantly negative relationship to economic growth...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010619073
Purpose: Using various macro-level measures of economic and political performance Shleifer and Treisman (2005) and Treisman (2014) call Russia a “normal country” implying that Russia’s economic and political development is not deviating from the other middle-income or transition countries...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012077049
Shleifer and Treisman (2005) argue that Russia is a “normal country.” Their benchmark for normalcy, however, refers primarily to middle-income countries like Mexico and Argentina. We propose that a more meaningful benchmark is the experience of other post-socialist transition countries,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004967624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485425
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485471
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000721776